Monday, August 22, 2011

Movie: The Omega Man

I'd like to say that this was - was - an intelligent well made movie befitting it's time, and that that time has passed and, alas, it has not aged well. I'd like to, but alas I snuck a peek just moments ago at Roger Ebert's then-current review, and find it is what it was: a well intentioned story bogged down in the ways of that age of storytelling, no less compelling today than it was then.

Of late, the then-uncredited novel "I Am Legend" has been remade into a telling a bit more believable. A bit. The core difficulty with this story, aside from creating a convincing world for the protagonist and all the technology and talent needed, is getting the zombies right. Heston's foes were too smart to be that stupid, and Smith's foes were too dumb to be that smart. The rest of the tale then struggles to cope with the resulting cognitive whiplash.

Given the intelligence and wit of "World War Z" (movie version pending with trepidation), I'm exploring the zombie genre in hopes of finding comparable competence. Some, like "The Omega Man", are obligatory viewing in this study. Obligatory, however, does not denote worthwhile.

Monday, August 1, 2011

Rant: A sponge only soaks up so much

For 2011,
· Revenue: $2.17T
· Spending: $3.82T
· Debt: $14.56T
 
Assuming all else remains unchanged[1], we’d have to cut federal spending by $2.14T – that’s 56% – to eliminate the debt in 30 years.
 
What’s that? “Increase taxes on the rich!” I hear, over and over?
 
... if individuals earning more than $200,000 were taxed at a 100 percent marginal rate–and we confiscated their passports so they could not flee–the take would come to $1.27 trillion, or just 77 percent of this year’s deficit.
- Arthur C. Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute
 
Ok, for sake of argument, raise taxes on the “rich” to 100%[2]. Kicking ballpark numbers around, that leaves $0.41T in cuts – real cuts, not “rate of increase cuts” – in spending just to stop the deficit hemorrhaging. We need another $0.49T in cuts – real cuts – to pay off the debt in a very generous 30 years.
 
So, ball back to the Democrats' court: going whole-hog 100% “tax the rich” nets about $1.27T, and the deficit is still out of control. What $0.90T in spending cuts is the Left willing to offer? This amounts to the minimum amount of spending cuts[3] we need to make now just to clean up this mess[4] over the next generation.
 
Sure, it’s more complicated than that – but that’s the core framework to operate from. If we tax “the rich” (loosely defined) to the point of running out of other people’s money, we see the minimum steps required just to start moving in the right direction.
 
One alternative to cutting spending is, of course, to increase revenue. But how? Consider:
 
As a result of reducing taxes on the rich, the rich got much richer — so much so that they wound up paying nearly four times as much total tax (and nearly three times as much tax per rich person) as when taxes were higher.
- http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/271013/folly-soaking-rich-mario-loyola#
 
“It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now … Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus.”
– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962
 
Your move.
 
1 - note that spending, in most cases, increases faster than revenue. Therein lies the core problem: political unwillingness to spend less than revenue.
2 - ignoring the agreed fact that increasing taxes on the rich slows the economy, and going to 100% would drive subsequent revenues to $0. This is reducto ad absurdum exercise in identifying how far each side is willing/capable to go.
3 - that’s real cuts, not “reductions in increase”. That’s next year and ongoing from that, not “over 10 years”.
4 - “this mess” is here, and continual pointing fingers years into the past at debatable causes doesn’t clean it up now.
 

Rant: Conspiracy of Oz

Legend has this quote:

Transported to a surreal landscape, a young girl kills the first woman she meets and then teams up with three complete strangers to kill again.
~ Rick Polito, Marin Independent Journal's TV listing for "The Wizard of Oz"

A co-worker's retort is too good to let fade:
I have always thought that Glinda was the real villain in the story. She could have sent Dorothy home right off the bat, but nooo- she was secretly plotting the demise of two of her world leaders- The Witch of the West and Oz. (She had already lived to see another foe destroyed, The Witch of the East.) I mean, the Witch of the West just wanted her now deceased sister’s magic shoes. Why wouldn’t she be angry when the person who just dropped a house on her sibling stole them from her? Dorothy was but an unwitting pawn in Glinda’s machinations to set up puppet governments (Scarecrow got Oz, The Tin Woodsman got Winkie Land in the east) all over the world and rule from on high in the North.

Friday, July 29, 2011

Movies: In Queue

I've posted movies I've seen.
Occurs to me to post my queue of what I haven't but want to.

3:10 to Yuma
Cinema 16: European Short Films: Disc 2
Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee
High Noon
Scarface
The Snow Walker
Fires of Kuwait: IMAX
Apocalypto
Serial Experiments Lain: Vol.1-4
Pixar Short Films: Vol. 1
Samurai Jack: Season 1-4
Philip Glass: Looking Glass
Untraceable
Hidden Fortress
Throne of Blood
Live Free or Die Hard
Stomp: Stomp Out Loud
Great Expectations
Hulk
Constantine
Underworld
Apocalypse Now / Apocalypse Now Redux
Gods and Generals
Dog Whisperer: Season 3
Gangs of New York
Cold Mountain
Reformation Overview
MirrorMask
Dark City: Director's Cut
The Kingdom
Layer Cake
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Grindhouse: Death Proof
Speed Racer
Iron Man
Strangers on a Train
Chaos
Mongol
Déjà Vu
Revenge
Samurai Trilogy 1: Musashi Miyamoto
Samurai Trilogy 2: Duel at Ichijoji Temple
Samurai Trilogy 3: Duel at Ganryu Island
Aliens vs. Predator 2
The City of Lost Children
Lions for Lambs
Papillon
Red Dawn
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
Cinema 16: European Short Films: Disc 1
Resident Evil: Degeneration
Cinema Paradiso
Dawn of the Dead
Inside the Actors Studio: Robin Williams
Don't Say a Word
Guns, Germs and Steel
The Andromeda Strain
Logan's Run
What Lies Beneath
The Others
Open Season 2
Glass: Portrait in Twelve Parts
Fraggle Rock: Season 1
The Spirit
The Postman
Moby Dick
The Leopard (English version)
Barry Lyndon
The Tale of Despereaux
The International
Tales of the Black Freighter / Under...
The Thief of Bagdad
The Thief of Bagdad: Bonus Material
Bolt
Kung Fu Panda
Horton Hears a Who!
Kiki's Delivery Service
Dinosaur
Brother Bear Widescreen Version
75th Annual Academy Awards Short Films
Pulse: Stomp Odyssey
Max Payne
Last Stand of the 300
Future Weapons: Season 1
The Ox-Bow Incident
Out of the Wild: The Alaska
Body of Lies
Hamlet
Public Enemies
Rebecca
My Dinner with Andre
True Romance
The White Countess
Sherlock Holmes
Snatch
Robin Hood
The Expendables
Inception
Salt
Star Trek
Up
Defiance
Red
The Secret of Kells
Wallace & Gromit: Loaf and Death
Wallace & Gromit: Three Amazing Adventures
The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest
The Tourist
The Illusionist
9
Sukiyaki Western Django
The King's Speech
13 Assassins
My Dog Tulip

(This is my current Netflix DVD list. Since Netflix is raising prices by a lot, and separating DVDs from streaming into a separate cost, and most DVDs sit around an average of a month before I get to 'em, I'm copying the list here partly for my own reminding as I'll drop DVD service soon. I hope the DVD industry is paying attention to how many people are doing this.)

Monday, July 18, 2011

Rant: "...but Democrats inherited this mess!"

I keep hearing Leftists complain that the Democrats inherited this economic mess.

The Democrat-dominated Congress inherited the situation in 2007, and continued the domination of Congress for 4 years – the first 2 under a compliant Republican[1] president, and next 2 under a sympathetic Democrat. During that short time, and in contrast to promises to end deficit spending (by whatever means), the debt increased nearly 60%[2]. AFAIK, no substantive spending cuts have been passed by either chamber during this period. To the contrary, the only recurring & earnest deficit-reduction suggestion is “end the Bush tax cuts for the rich”; eliminating the deficit thru tax increase would require a 100% rate on all income over $200,000.
 
At some point the steaming bag on the desk is the current occupant’s responsibility.
Especially when a second one appears during the occupancy.
 
1 – issued 12 vetos, half of which were resolved or overridden, the rest were not significant economic differences.
2 – that’s a 60% increase in 4 years over what debt had accumulated in more than 2 centuries.

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Movie: Just Go With It

Better yet, don't.
The two things this romantic comedy lacks are, in large part, romance and comedy.

Enough is injected to attract the genre label and provide cuts for a convincing trailer. The remaining runtime is devoted to setting up embarrassing situations, earned or not, and attempting to laugh at the subjects thereof; for most movies I tend to wander off for the few awkward minutes this occurs, but by starting there and never letting up I'd have been rude to the audience and to my $5 expended for the iTunes rental.

Its hard to sympathize with the romantic leanings of a lecherous protagonist, a doctor whose patients would be wise to walk out upon his bedside manner. That the frumpy babe wants his hand may work out fine and special for her, but there are other romances for us to enjoy on screen. That the hot babe is hot guarantees she will not end this with the marital devotion her kind & patient heart deserves.

The remaining theatrical attributes worth considering evaluate in kind. The cinematography is perfunctory: correct, but not special. Music prolific, but borrowed. Acting, gratuitous. Cast, wasted despite laudable efforts by Jennifer Aniston and Brooklyn Decker.

It is, to wit, an Adam Sandler film.

Monday, June 13, 2011

Movie: Tron:Legacy

A sequel embracing the true spirit of sequels:
  • bigger budget (by 10x: $170M vs. $17M)
  • better technology (by 10,000x: Moore's Law)
  • more hero (by 3x: not just one Jeff Bridges but three of 'em)
  • highlights redux bigger (disc battles, lightcycle races, honkin' big wierd machines)
  • awesome music (Walter Carlos, meet Daft Punk)
  • more overall spectacle (imparting "yeah, that's what I remember, but cooler!")
  • and...and...oh, what was that last thing...oh, right - plot (I guess that mangled heap in the corner is a plot).

For geeks remembering Atari 800s and PC-selling Charlie Chaplin, a must-see return to a historical milestone.
For anyone else, a high-tech fireworks show - no real meaning, but still really fun to watch.